Vienna Convention on Laws of Treaties Relations (1969)

Article 1
Scope of the present ConventionThe present Convention applies to treaties between States.
Article 2
Use of terms1. For the purposes of the present Convention:(a) 'treaty' means an international agreement concluded between States in written form and governed by international law, whether embodied in a single instrument or in two or more related instruments and whatever its particular designation;(b) 'ratification', 'acceptance', 'approval' and 'accession' mean in each case the international act so named whereby a State establishes on the international plane its consent to be bound by a treaty;(c) 'full powers' means a document emanating from the competent authority of a State designating a person or persons to represent the State for negotiating, adopting or authenticating the text of a treaty, for expressing the consent of the State to be bound by a treaty, or for accomplishing any other act with respect to a treaty;(d) 'reservation' means a unilateral statement, however phrased or named, made by a State, when signing, ratifying, accepting, approving or acceding to a treaty, whereby it purports to exclude or to modify the legal effect of certain provisions of the treaty in their application to that State;(e) 'negotiating State' means a State which took part in the drawing up and adoption of the text of the treaty;(f) 'contracting State' means a State which has consented to be bound by the treaty, whether or not the treaty has entered into force;(g) 'party' means a State which has consented to be bound by the treaty and for which the treaty is in force;(h) 'third State' means a State not a party to the treaty;(i) 'international organization' means an intergovernmental organization. 2. The provisions of paragraph 1 regarding the use of terms in the present Convention are without prejudice to the use of those terms or to the meanings which may be given to them in the internal law of any State.
Article 3
International agreements not within the scope of the present ConventionThe fact that the present Convention does not apply to international agreements concluded between States and other subjects of international law or between such other subjects of international law, or to international agreements not in written form, shall not affect:(a) the legal force of such agreements;(b) the application to them of any of the rules set forth in the present Convention to which they would be subject under international law independently of the Convention;(c) the application of the Convention to the relations of States as between themselves under international agreements to which other subjects of international law are also parties.
Article 4
Non-retroactivity of the present ConventionWithout prejudice to the application of any rules set forth in the present Convention to which treaties would be subject under international law independently of the Convention, the Convention applies only to treaties which are concluded by States after the entry into force of the present Convention with regard to such States.
Article 5
Treaties constituting international organizations and treaties adopted within an international organizationThe present Convention applies to any treaty which is the constituent instrument of an international organization and to any treaty adopted within an international organization without prejudice to any relevant rules of the organization..+ Part II: Conclusion and Entry into Force of Treaties.SECTION 1. CONCLUSION OF TREATIES
Article 6
Capacity of States to conclude treatiesEvery State possesses capacity to conclude treaties.
Article 7
Full powers1. A person is considered as representing a State for the purpose of adopting or authenticating the text of a treaty or for the purpose of expressing the consent of the State to be bound by a treaty if:(a) he produces appropriate full powers; or(b) it appears from the practice of the States concerned or from other circumstances that their intention was to consider that person as representing the State for such purposes and to dispense with full powers.2. In virtue of their functions and without having to produce full powers, the following are considered as representing their State:(a) Heads of State, Heads of Government and Ministers for Foreign Affairs, for the purpose of performing all acts relating to the conclusion of a treaty;(b) heads of diplomatic missions, for the purpose of adopting the text of a treaty between the accrediting State and the State to which they are accredited;(c) representatives accredited by States to an international conference or to an international organization or one of its organs, for the purpose of adopting the text of a treaty in that conference, organization or organ.
Article 8
Subsequent confirmation of an act performed without authorizationAn act relating to the conclusion of a treaty performed by a person who cannot be considered under article 7 as authorized to represent a State for that purpose is without legal effect unless afterwards confirmed by that State.
Article 9
Adoption of the text1. The adoption of the text of a treaty takes place by the consent of all the States participating in its drawing up except as provided in paragraph 2.2. The adoption of the text of a treaty at an international conference takes place by the vote of two-thirds of the States present and voting, unless by the same majority they shall decide to apply a different rule.
Article 10
Authentication of the textThe text of a treaty is established as authentic and definitive:(a) by such procedure as may be provided for in the text or agreed upon by the States participating in its drawing up; or(b) failing such procedure, by the signature, signature ad referendum or initialling by the representatives of those States of the text of the treaty or of the Final Act of a conference incorporating the text.
Article 11
Means of expressing consent to be bound by a treatyThe consent of a State to be bound by a treaty may be expressed by signature, exchange of instruments constituting a treaty, ratification, acceptance, approval or accession, or by any other means if so agreed.
Article 12
Consent to be bound by a treaty expressed by signature1. The consent of a State to be bound by a treaty is expressed by the signature of its representative when:(a) the treaty provides that signature shall have that effect;(b) it is otherwise established that the negotiating States were agreed that signature should have that effect; or(c) the intention of the State to give that effect to the signature appears from the full powers of its representative or was expressed during the negotiation.2. For the purposes of paragraph 1:(a) the initialling of a text constitutes a signature of the treaty when it is established that the negotiating States so agreed;(b) the signature ad referendum of a treaty by a representative, if confirmed by his State, constitutes a full signature of the treaty.
Article 13
Consent to be bound by a treaty expressed by an exchange of instruments constituting a treatyThe consent of States to be bound by a treaty constituted by instruments exchanged between them is expressed by that exchange when:(a) the instruments provide that their exchange shall have that effect; or(b) it is otherwise established that those States were agreed that the exchange of instruments should have that effect.
Article 14
Consent to be bound by a treaty expressed by ratification, acceptance or approval1. The consent of a State to be bound by a treaty is expressed by ratification when:(a) the treaty provides for such consent to be expressed by means of ratification;(b) it is otherwise established that the negotiating States were agreed that ratification should be required;(c) the representative of the State has signed the treaty subject to ratification; or(d) the intention of the State to sign the treaty subject to ratification appears from the full powers of its representative or was expressed during the negotiation.2. The consent of a State to be bound by a treaty is expressed by acceptance or approval under conditions similar to those which apply to ratification.
Article 15
Consent to be bound by a treaty expressed by accessionThe consent of a State to be bound by a treaty is expressed by accession when:(a) the treaty provides that such consent may be expressed by that State by means of accession;(b) it is otherwise established that the negotiating States were agreed that such consent may be expressed by that State by means of accession; or(c) all the parties have subsequently agreed that such consent may be expressed by that State by means of accession.
Article 16
Exchange or deposit of instruments of ratification, acceptance, approval or accessionUnless the treaty otherwise provides, instruments of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession establish the consent of a State to be bound by a treaty upon:(a) their exchange between the contracting States;(b) their deposit with the depositary; or(c) their notification to the contracting States or to the depositary, if so agreed.
Article 17
Consent to be bound by part of a treaty and choice of differing provisions1. Without prejudice to articles 19 to 23, the consent of a State to be bound by part of a treaty is effective only if the treaty so permits or the other contracting States so agree.2. The consent of a State to be bound by a treaty which permits a choice between differing provisions is effective only if it is made clear to which of the provisions the consent relates.
Article 18
Obligation not to defeat the object and purpose of a treaty prior to its entry into forceA State is obliged to refrain from acts which would defeat the object and purpose of a treaty when:(a) it has signed the treaty or has exchanged instruments constituting the treaty subject to ratification, acceptance or approval, until it shall have made its intention clear not to become a party to the treaty; or(b) it has expressed its consent to be bound by the treaty, pending the entry into force of the treaty and provided that such entry into force is not unduly delayed.SECTION 2. RESERVATIONS
Article 19
Formulation of reservationsA State may, when signing, ratifying, accepting, approving or acceding to a treaty, formulate a reservation unless:(a) the reservation is prohibited by the treaty;(b) the treaty provides that only specified reservations, which do not include the reservation in question, may be made; or(c) in cases not falling under sub-paragraphs (a) and (b), the reservation is incompatible with the object and purpose of the treaty.
Article 20
Acceptance of and objection to reservations1. A reservation expressly authorized by a treaty does not require any subsequent acceptance by the other contracting States unless the treaty so provides.2. When it appears from the limited number of the negotiating States and the object and purpose of a treaty that the application of the treaty in its entirety between all the parties is an essential condition of the consent of each one to be bound by the treaty, a reservation requires acceptance by all the parties.3. When a treaty is a constituent instrument of an international organization and unless it otherwise provides, a reservation requires the acceptance of the competent organ of that organization.4. In cases not falling under the preceding paragraphs and unless the treaty otherwise provides:(a) acceptance by another contracting State of a reservation constitutes the reserving State a party to the treaty in relation to that other State if or when the treaty is in force for those States;(b) an objection by another contracting State to a reservation does not preclude the entry into force of the treaty as between the objecting and reserving States unless a contrary intention is definitely expressed by the objecting State;(c) an act expressing a State's consent to be bound by the treaty and containing a reservation is effective as soon as at least one other contracting State has accepted the reservation.5. For the purposes of paragraphs 2 and 4 and unless the treaty otherwise provides, a reservation is considered to have been accepted by a State if it shall have raised no objection to the reservation by the end of a period of twelve months after it was notified of the reservation or by the date on which it expressed its consent to be bound by the treaty, whichever is later.
Article 21
Legal effects of reservations and of objections to reservations1. A reservation established with regard to another party in accordance with articles 19, 20 and 23:(a) modifies for the reserving State in its relations with that other party the provisions of the treaty to which the reservation relates to the extent of the reservation; and(b) modifies those provisions to the same extent for that other party in its relations with the reserving State.2. The reservation does not modify the provisions of the treaty for the other parties to the treaty inter se.3. When a State objecting to a reservation has not opposed the entry into force of the treaty between itself and the reserving State, the provisions to which the reservation relates do not apply as between the two States to the extent of the reservation.
Article 22
Withdrawal of reservations and of objections to reservations1. Unless the treaty otherwise provides, a reservation may be withdrawn at any time and the consent of a State which has accepted the reservation is not required for its withdrawal.2. Unless the treaty otherwise provides, an objection to a reservation may be withdrawn at any time.3. Unless the treaty otherwise provides, or it is otherwise agreed:(a) the withdrawal of a reservation becomes operative in relation to another contracting State only when notice of it has been received by that State;(b) the withdrawal of an objection to a reservation becomes operative only when notice of it has been received by the State which formulated the reservation.
Article 23
Procedure regarding reservations1. A reservation, an express acceptance of a reservation and an objection to a reservation must be formulated in writing and communicated to the contracting States and other States entitled to become parties to the treaty.2. If formulated when signing the treaty subject to ratification, acceptance or approval, a reservation must be formally confirmed by the reserving State when expressing its consent to be bound by the treaty. In such a case the reservation shall be considered as having been made on the date of its confirmation.3. An express acceptance of, or an objection to, a reservation made previously to confirmation of the reservation does not itself require confirmation.4. The withdrawal of a reservation or of an objection to a reservation must be formulated in writing.SECTION 3. ENTRY INTO FORCE AND PROVISIONAL APPLICATION OF TREATIES
Article 24
Entry into force1. A treaty enters into force in such manner and upon such date as it may provide or as the negotiating States may agree.2. Failing any such provision or agreement, a treaty enters into force as soon as consent to be bound by the treaty has been established for all the negotiating States.3. When the consent of a State to be bound by a treaty is established on a date after the treaty has come into force, the treaty enters into force for that State on that date, unless the treaty otherwise provides.4. The provisions of a treaty regulating the authentication of its text, the establishment of the consent of States to be bound by the treaty, the manner or date of its entry into force, reservations, the functions of the depositary and other matters arising necessarily before the entry into force of the treaty apply from the time of the adoption of its text.
Article 25
Provisional application1. A treaty or a part of a treaty is applied provisionally pending its entry into force if:(a) the treaty itself so provides; or(b) the negotiating States have in some other manner so agreed.2. Unless the treaty otherwise provides or the negotiating States have otherwise agreed, the provisional application of a treaty or a part of a treaty with respect to a State shall be terminated if that State notifies the other States between which the treaty is being applied provisionally of its intention not to become a party to the treaty..+ Part III: Observance, Application and Interpretation of Treaties.SECTION 1. OBSERVANCE OF TREATIES
Article 26
Pacta sunt servandaEvery treaty in force is binding upon the parties to it and must be performed by them in good faith.
Article 27
Internal law and observance of treatiesA party may not invoke the provisions of its internal law as justification for its failure to perform a treaty. This rule is without prejudice to article 46.SECTION 2. APPLICATION OF TREATIES
Article 28
Non-retroactivity of treatiesUnless a different intention appears from the treaty or is otherwise established, its provisions do not bind a party in relation to any act or fact which took place or any situation which ceased to exist before the date of the entry into force of the treaty with respect to that party.
Article 29
Territorial scope of treatiesUnless a different intention appears from the treaty or is otherwise established, a treaty is binding upon each party in respect of its entire territory.
Article 30
Application of successive treaties relating to the same subject-matter1. Subject to Article 103 of the Charter of the United Nations, the rights and obligations of States parties to successive treaties relating to the same subject-matter shall be determined in accordance with the following paragraphs.2. When a treaty specifies that it is subject to, or that it is not to be considered as incompatible with, an earlier or later treaty, the provisions of that other treaty prevail.3. When all the parties to the earlier treaty are parties also to the later treaty but the earlier treaty is not terminated or suspended in operation under article 59, the earlier treaty applies only to the extent that its provisions are compatible with those of the latter treaty.4. When the parties to the later treaty do not include all the parties to the earlier one:(a) as between States parties to both treaties the same rule applies as in paragraph 3;(b) as between a State party to both treaties and a State party to only one of the treaties, the treaty to which both States are parties governs their mutual rights and obligations.5. Paragraph 4 is without prejudice to article 41, or to any question of the termination or suspension of the operation of a treaty under article 60 or to any question of responsibility which may arise for a State from the conclusion or application of a treaty the provisions of which are incompatible with its obligations towards another State under another treaty.SECTION 3. INTERPRETATION OF TREATIES
Article 31
General rule of interpretation1. A treaty shall be interpreted in good faith in accordance with the ordinary meaning to be given to the terms of the treaty in their context and in the light of its object and purpose.2. The context for the purpose of the interpretation of a treaty shall comprise, in addition to the text, including its preamble and annexes:(a) any agreement relating to the treaty which was made between all the parties in connection with the conclusion of the treaty;(b) any instrument which was made by one or more parties in connection with the conclusion of the treaty and accepted by the other parties as an instrument related to the treaty.3. There shall be taken into account, together with the context:(a) any subsequent agreement between the parties regarding the interpretation of the treaty or the application of its provisions;(b) any subsequent practice in the application of the treaty which establishes the agreement of the parties regarding its interpretation;(c) any relevant rules of international law applicable in the relations between the parties.4. A special meaning shall be given to a term if it is established that the parties so intended.
Article 32
Supplementary means of interpretationRecourse may be had to supplementary means of interpretation, including the preparatory work of the treaty and the circumstances of its conclusion, in order to confirm the meaning resulting from the application of article 31, or to determine the meaning when the interpretation according to article 31:(a) leaves the meaning ambiguous or obscure; or(b) leads to a result which is manifestly absurd or unreasonable.
Article 33
Interpretation of treaties authenticated in two or more languages1. When a treaty has been authenticated in two or more languages, the text is equally authoritative in each language, unless the treaty provides or the parties agree that, in case of divergence, a particular text shall prevail.2. A version of the treaty in a language other than one of those in which the text was authenticated shall be considered an authentic text only if the treaty so provides or the parties so agree.3. The terms of the treaty are presumed to have the same meaning in each authentic text.4. Except where a particular text prevails in accordance with paragraph 1, when a comparison of the authentic texts discloses a difference of meaning which the application of articles 31 and 32 does not remove, the meaning which best reconciles the texts, having regard to the object and purpose of the treaty, shall be adopted.SECTION 4. TREATIES AND THIRD STATES
Article 34
General rule regarding third StatesA treaty does not create either obligations or rights for a third State without its consent.
Article 35
Treaties providing for obligations for third StatesAn obligation arises for a third State from a provision of a treaty if the parties to the treaty intend the provision to be the means of establishing the obligation and the third State expressly accepts that obligation in writing.
Article 36
Treaties providing for rights for third States1. A right arises for a third State from a provision of a treaty if the parties to the treaty intend the provision to accord that right either to the third State, or to a group of States to which it belongs, or to all States, and the third State assents thereto. Its assent shall be presumed so long as the contrary is not indicated, unless the treaty otherwise provides.2. A State exercising a right in accordance with paragraph 1 shall comply with the conditions for its exercise provided for in the treaty or established in conformity with the treaty.
Article 37
Revocation or modification of obligations or rights of third States1. When an obligation has arisen for a third State in conformity with article 35, the obligation may be revoked or modified only with the consent of the parties to the treaty and of the third State, unless it is established that they had otherwise agreed.2. When a right has arisen for a third State in conformity with article 36, the right may not be revoked or modified by the parties if it is established that the right was intended not to be revocable or subject to modification without the consent of the third State.
Article 38
Rules in a treaty becoming binding on third States through international customNothing in articles 34 to 37 precludes a rule set forth in a treaty from becoming binding upon a third State as a customary rule of international law, recognized as such..+ Part IV: Amendment and Modification of Treaties.
Article 39
General rule regarding the amendment of treatiesA treaty may be amended by agreement between the parties. The rules laid down in Part II apply to such an agreement except in so far as the treaty may otherwise provide.
Article 40
Amendment of multilateral treaties1. Unless the treaty otherwise provides, the amendment of multilateral treaties shall be governed by the following paragraphs.2. Any proposal to amend a multilateral treaty as between all the parties must be notified to all the contracting States, each one of which shall have the right to take part in:(a) the decision as to the action to be taken in regard to such proposal;(b) the negotiation and conclusion of any agreement for the amendment of the treaty.3. Every State entitled to become a party to the treaty shall also be entitled to become a party to the treaty as amended.4. The amending agreement does not bind any State already a party to the treaty which does not become a party to the amending agreement; article 30, paragraph 4(b), applies in relation to such State.5. Any State which becomes a party to the treaty after the entry into force of the amending agreement shall, failing an expression of a different intention by that State:(a) be considered as a party to the treaty as amended; and(b) be considered as a party to the unamended treaty in relation to any party to the treaty not bound by the amending agreement.
Article 41
Agreements to modify multilateral treaties between certain of the parties only1. Two or more of the parties to a multilateral treaty may conclude an agreement to modify the treaty as between themselves alone if:(a) the possibility of such a modification is provided for by the treaty; or(b) the modification in question is not prohibited by the treaty and:- (i) does not affect the enjoyment by the other parties of their rights under the treaty or the performance of their obligations;- (ii) does not relate to a provision, derogation from which is incompatible with the effective execution of the object and purpose of the treaty as a whole.2. Unless in a case falling under paragraph 1(a) the treaty otherwise provides, the parties in question shall notify the other parties of their intention to conclude the agreement and of the modification to the treaty for which it provides..+ Part V: Invalidity, Termination and Suspension of the Operation of Treaties.SECTION 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS
Article 42
Validity and continuance in force of treaties1. The validity of a treaty or of the consent of a State to be bound by a treaty may be impeached only through the application of the present Convention.2. The termination of a treaty, its denunciation or the withdrawal of a party, may take place only as a result of the application of the provisions of the treaty or of the present Convention. The same rule applies to suspension of the operation of a treaty.
Article 43
Obligations imposed by international law independently of a treatyThe invalidity, termination or denunciation of a treaty, the withdrawal of a party from it, or the suspension of its operation, as a result of the application of the present Convention or of the provisions of the treaty, shall not in any way impair the duty of any State to fulfil any obligation embodied in the treaty to which it would be subject under international law independently of the treaty.
Article 44
Separability of treaty provisions1. A right of a party, provided for in a treaty or arising under article 56, to denounce, withdraw from or suspend the operation of the treaty may be exercised only with respect to the whole treaty unless the treaty otherwise provides or the parties otherwise agree.2. A ground for invalidating, terminating, withdrawing from or suspending the operation of a treaty recognized in the present Convention may be invoked only with respect to the whole treaty except as provided in the following paragraphs or in article 60.3. If the ground relates solely to particular clauses, it may be invoked only with respect to those clauses where:(a) the said clauses are separable from the remainder of the treaty with regard to their application;(b) it appears from the treaty or is otherwise established that acceptance of those clauses was not an essential basis of the consent of the other party or parties to be bound by the treaty as a whole; and(c) continued performance of the remainder of the treaty would not be unjust.4. In cases falling under articles 49 and 50 the State entitled to invoke the fraud or corruption may do so with respect either to the whole treaty or, subject to paragraph 3, to the particular clauses alone.5. In cases falling under articles 51, 52 and 53, no separation of the provisions of the treaty is permitted.
Article 45
Loss of a right to invoke a ground for invalidating, terminating, withdrawing from or suspending the operation of a treatyA State may no longer invoke a ground for invalidating, terminating, withdrawing from or suspending the operation of a treaty under articles 46 to 50 or articles 60 and 62 if, after becoming aware of the facts:(a) it shall have expressly agreed that the treaty is valid or remains in force or continues in operation, as the case may be; or(b) it must by reason of its conduct be considered as having acquiesced in the validity of the treaty or in its maintenance in force or in operation, as the case may be.SECTION 2. INVALIDITY OF TREATIES
Article 46
Provisions of internal law regarding competence to conclude treaties1. A State may not invoke the fact that its consent to be bound by a treaty has been expressed in violation of a provision of its internal law regarding competence to conclude treaties as invalidating its consent unless that violation was manifest and concerned a rule of its internal law of fundamental importance.2. A violation is manifest if it would be objectively evident to any State conducting itself in the matter in accordance with normal practice and in good faith.
Article 47
Specific restrictions on authority to express the consent of a StateIf the authority of a representative to express the consent of a State to be bound by a particular treaty has been made subject to a specific restriction, his omission to observe that restriction may not be invoked as invalidating the consent expressed by him unless the restriction was notified to the other negotiating States prior to his expressing such consent.
Article 48
Error1. A State may invoke an error in a treaty as invalidating its consent to be bound by the treaty if the error relates to a fact or situation which was assumed by that State to exist at the time when the treaty was concluded and formed an essential basis of its consent to be bound by the treaty.2. Paragraph 1 shall not apply if the State in question contributed by its own conduct to the error or if the circumstances were such as to put that State on notice of a possible error.3. An error relating only to the wording of the text of a treaty does not affect its validity; article 79 then applies.
Article 49
FraudIf a State has been induced to conclude a treaty by the fraudulent conduct of another negotiating State, the State may invoke the fraud as invalidating its consent to be bound by the treaty.
Article 50
Corruption of a representative of a StateIf the expression of a State's consent to be bound by a treaty has been procured through the corruption of its representative directly or indirectly by another negotiating State, the State may invoke such corruption as invalidating its consent to be bound by the treaty.
Article 51
Coercion of a representative of a StateThe expression of a State's consent to be bound by a treaty which has been procured by the coercion of its representative through acts or threats directed against him shall be without any legal effect.
Article 52
Coercion of a State by the threat or use of forceA treaty is void if its conclusion has been procured by the threat or use of force in violation of the principles of international law embodied in the Charter of the United Nations.
Article 53
Treaties conflicting with a peremptory norm of general international law (jus cogens)A treaty is void if, at the time of its conclusion, it conflicts with a peremptory norm of general international law. For the purposes of the present Convention, a peremptory norm of general international law is a norm accepted and recognized by the international community of States as a whole as a norm from which no derogation is permitted and which can be modified only by a subsequent norm of general international law having the same character.SECTION 3. TERMINATION AND SUSPENSION OF THE OPERATION OF TREATIES
Article 54
Termination of or withdrawal from a treaty under its provisions or by consent of the partiesThe termination of a treaty or the withdrawal of a party may take place:(a) in conformity with the provisions of the treaty; or(b) at any time by consent of all the parties after consultation with the other contracting States.
Article 55
Reduction of the parties to a multilateral treaty below the number necessary for its entry into forceUnless the treaty otherwise provides, a multilateral treaty does not terminate by reason only of the fact that the number of the parties falls below the number necessary for its entry into force.
Article 56
Denunciation of or withdrawal from a treaty containing no provision regarding termination, denunciation or withdrawal1. A treaty which contains no provision regarding its termination and which does not provide for denunciation or withdrawal is not subject to denunciation or withdrawal unless:(a) it is established that the parties intended to admit the possibility of denunciation or withdrawal; or(b) a right of denunciation or withdrawal may be implied by the nature of the treaty.2. A party shall give not less than twelve months' notice of its intention to denounce or withdraw from a treaty under paragraph 1.
Article 57
Suspension of the operation of a treaty under its provisions or by consent of the partiesThe operation of a treaty in regard to all the parties or to a particular party may be suspended:(a) in conformity with the provisions of the treaty; or(b) at any time by consent of all the parties after consultation with the other contracting States.
Article 58
Suspension of the operation of a multilateral treaty by agreement between certain of the parties only1. Two or more parties to a multilateral treaty may conclude an agreement to suspend the operation of provisions of the treaty, temporarily and as between themselves alone, if:(a) the possibility of such a suspension is provided for by the treaty; or(b) the suspension in question is not prohibited by the treaty and:- (i) does not affect the enjoyment by the other parties of their rights under the treaty or the performance of their obligations;- (ii) is not incompatible with the object and purpose of the treaty.2. Unless in a case falling under paragraph 1(a) the treaty otherwise provides, the parties in question shall notify the other parties of their intention to conclude the agreement and of those provisions of the treaty the operation of which they intend to suspend.
Article 59
Termination or suspension of the operation of a treaty implied by conclusion of a later treaty1. A treaty shall be considered as terminated if all the parties to it conclude a later treaty relating to the same subject-matter and:(a) it appears from the later treaty or is otherwise established that the parties intended that the matter should be governed by that treaty; or(b) the provisions of the later treaty are so far incompatible with those of the earlier one that the two treaties are not capable of being applied at the same time.2. The earlier treaty shall be considered as only suspended in operation if it appears from the later treaty or is otherwise established that such was the intention of the parties.
Article 60
Termination or suspension of the operation of a treaty as a consequence of its breach1. A material breach of a bilateral treaty by one of the parties entitles the other to invoke the breach as a ground for terminating the treaty or suspending its operation in whole or in part.2. A material breach of a multilateral treaty by one of the parties entitles:(a) the other parties by unanimous agreement to suspend the operation of the treaty in whole or in part or to terminate it either:- (i) in the relations between themselves and the defaulting State, or- (ii) as between all the parties;(b) a party specially affected by the breach to invoke it as a ground for suspending the operation of the treaty in whole or in part in the relations between itself and the defaulting State;(c) any party other than the defaulting State to invoke the breach as a ground for suspending the operation of the treaty in whole or in part with respect to itself if the treaty is of such a character that a material breach of its provisions by one party radically changes the position of every party with respect to the further performance of its obligations under the treaty.3. A material breach of a treaty, for the purposes of this article, consists in:(a) a repudiation of the treaty not sanctioned by the present Convention; or(b) the violation of a provision essential to the accomplishment of the object or purpose of the treaty.4. The foregoing paragraphs are without prejudice to any provision in the treaty applicable in the event of a breach.5. Paragraphs 1 to 3 do not apply to provisions relating to the protection of the human person contained in treaties of a humanitarian character, in particular to provisions prohibiting any form of reprisals against persons protected by such treaties.
Article 61
Supervening impossibility of performance1. A party may invoke the impossibility of performing a treaty as a ground for terminating or withdrawing from it if the impossibility results from the permanent disappearance or destruction of an object indispensable for the execution of the treaty. If the impossibility is temporary, it may be invoked only as a ground for suspending the operation of the treaty.2. Impossibility of performance may not be invoked by a party as a ground for terminating, withdrawing from or suspending the operation of a treaty if the impossibility is the result of a breach by that party either of an obligation under the treaty or of any other international obligation owed to any other party to the treaty.
Article 62
Fundamental change of circumstances1. A fundamental change of circumstances which has occurred with regard to those existing at the time of the conclusion of a treaty, and which was not foreseen by the parties, may not be invoked as a ground for terminating or withdrawing from the treaty unless:(a) the existence of those circumstances constituted an essential basis of the consent of the parties to be bound by the treaty; and(b) the effect of the change is radically to transform the extent of obligations still to be performed under the treaty.2. A fundamental change of circumstances may not be invoked as a ground for terminating or withdrawing from a treaty:(a) if the treaty establishes a boundary; or(b) if the fundamental change is the result of a breach by the party invoking it either of an obligation under the treaty or of any other international obligation owed to any other party to the treaty.3. If, under the foregoing paragraphs, a party may invoke a fundamental change of circumstances as a ground for terminating or withdrawing from a treaty it may also invoke the change as a ground for suspending the operation of the treaty.
Article 63
Severance of diplomatic or consular relationsThe severance of diplomatic or consular relations between parties to a treaty does not affect the legal relations established between them by the treaty except in so far as the existence of diplomatic or consular relations is indispensable for the application of the treaty.
Article 64
Emergence of a new peremptory norm of general international law (jus cogens)If a new peremptory norm of general international law emerges, any existing treaty which is in conflict with that norm becomes void and terminates.

SECTION 4. PROCEDURE
Article 65
Procedure to be followed with respect to invalidity, termination, withdrawal from or suspension of the operation of a treaty1. A party which, under the provisions of the present Convention, invokes either a defect in its consent to be bound by a treaty or a ground for impeaching the validity of a treaty, terminating it, withdrawing from it or suspending its operation, must notify the other parties of its claim. The notification shall indicate the measure proposed to be taken with respect to the treaty and the reasons therefor.2. If, after the expiry of a period which, except in cases of special urgency, shall not be less than three months after the receipt of the notification, no party has raised any objection, the party making the notification may carry out in the manner provided in article 67 the measure which it has proposed.3. If, however, objection has been raised by any other party, the parties shall seek a solution through the means indicated in article 33 of the Charter of the United Nations.4. Nothing in the foregoing paragraphs shall affect the rights or obligations of the parties under any provisions in force binding the parties with regard to the settlement of disputes.5. Without prejudice to article 45, the fact that a State has not previously made the notification prescribed in paragraph 1 shall not prevent it from making such notification in answer to another party claiming performance of the treaty or alleging its violation.
Article 66
Procedures for judicial settlement, arbitration and conciliationIf, under paragraph 3 of article 65, no solution has been reached within a period of 12 months following the date on which the objection was raised, the following procedures shall be followed:(a) any one of the parties to a dispute concerning the application or the interpretation of articles 53 or 64 may, by a written application, submit it to the International Court of Justice for a decision unless the parties by common consent agree to submit the dispute to arbitration;(b) any one of the parties to a dispute concerning the application or the interpretation of any of the other articles in Part V of the present Convention may set in motion the procedure specified in the Annex to the Convention by submitting a request to that effect to the Secretary-General of the United Nations.
Article 67
Instruments for declaring invalid, terminating, withdrawing from or suspending the operation of a treaty1. The notification provided for under article 65 paragraph 1 must be made in writing.2. Any act declaring invalid, terminating, withdrawing from or suspending the operation of a treaty pursuant to the provisions of the treaty or of paragraphs 2 or 3 of article 65 shall be carried out through an instrument communicated to the other parties. If the instrument is not signed by the Head of State, Head of Government or Minister for Foreign Affairs, the representative of the State communicating it may be called upon to produce full powers.
Article 68
Revocation of notifications and instruments provided for in articles 65 and 67A notification or instrument provided for in articles 65 or 67 may be revoked at any time before it takes effect.SECTION 5. CONSEQUENCES OF THE INVALIDITY, TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION OF THE OPERATION OF A TREATY
Article 69
Consequences of the invalidity of a treaty1. A treaty the invalidity of which is established under the present Convention is void. The provisions of a void treaty have no legal force.2. If acts have nevertheless been performed in reliance on such a treaty:(a) each party may require any other party to establish as far as possible in their mutual relations the position that would have existed if the acts had not been performed;(b) acts performed in good faith before the invalidity was invoked are not rendered unlawful by reason only of the invalidity of the treaty.3. In cases falling under articles 49, 50, 51 or 52, paragraph 2 does not apply with respect to the party to which the fraud, the act of corruption or the coercion is imputable.4. In the case of the invalidity of a particular State's consent to be bound by a multilateral treaty, the foregoing rules apply in the relations between that State and the parties to the treaty.
Article 70
Consequences of the termination of a treaty1. Unless the treaty otherwise provides or the parties otherwise agree, the termination of a treaty under its provisions or in accordance with the present Convention:(a) releases the parties from any obligation further to perform the treaty;(b) does not affect any right, obligation or legal situation of the parties created through the execution of the treaty prior to its termination.2. If a State denounces or withdraws from a multilateral treaty, paragraph 1 applies in the relations between that State and each of the other parties to the treaty from the date when such denunciation or withdrawal takes effect.
Article 71
Consequences of the invalidity of a treaty which conflict with a peremptory norm of general international law1. In the case of a treaty which is void under article 53 the parties shall:(a) eliminate as far as possible the consequences of any act performed in reliance on any provision which conflicts with the peremptory norm of general international law; and(b) bring their mutual relations into conformity with the peremptory norm of general international law.2. In the case of a treaty which becomes void and terminates under article 64, the termination of the treaty:(a) releases the parties from any obligation further to perform the treaty;(b) does not affect any right, obligation or legal situation of the parties created through the execution of the treaty prior to its termination; provided that those rights, obligations or situations may thereafter be maintained only to the extent that their maintenance is not in itself in conflict with the new peremptory norm of general international law.
Article 72
Consequences of the suspension of the operation of a treaty1. Unless the treaty otherwise provides or the parties otherwise agree, the suspension of the operation of a treaty under its provisions or in accordance with the present Convention:(a) releases the parties between which the operation of the treaty is suspended from the obligation to perform the treaty in their mutual relations during the period of the suspension;(b) does not otherwise affect the legal relations between the parties established by the treaty.2. During the period of the suspension the parties shall refrain from acts tending to obstruct the resumption of the operation of the treaty..+ Part VI: Miscellaneous Provisions.
Article 73
Cases of State succession, State responsibility and outbreak of hostilitiesThe provisions of the present Convention shall not prejudge any question that may arise in regard to a treaty from a succession of States or from the international responsibility of a State or from the outbreak of hostilities between States.
Article 74
Diplomatic and consular relations and the conclusion of treatiesThe severance or absence of diplomatic or consular relations between two or more States does not prevent the conclusion of treaties between those States. The conclusion of a treaty does not in itself affect the situation in regard to diplomatic or consular relations.
Article 75
Case of an aggressor StateThe provisions of the present Convention are without prejudice to any obligation in relation to a treaty which may arise for an aggressor State in consequence of measures taken in conformity with the Charter of the United Nations with reference to that State's aggression..- Part VII: Depositaries, Notifications, Corrections and Registration